PubMed
5 編の国際論文
PANCREASaver® に関連する代表的な 5 編の学術発表(すべて台湾大学チームによる実在の研究)。日本語訳は原文抄録に基づく整理です。
The Lancet Digital Health · 2020
Open Access
Deep learning to distinguish pancreatic cancer tissue from non-cancerous pancreatic tissue: a retrospective study with cross-racial external validation
Deep learning to distinguish pancreatic cancer tissue from non-cancerous pancreatic tissue: a retrospective study with cross-racial external validation
92.1%<2cm 腫瘍への感度
11/12放射線科が見逃した症例の検出
AUC 0.997ローカルテストセット
Deep learning to distinguish pancreatic cancer tissue from non-cancerous pancreatic tissue: a retrospective study with cross-racial external validation.
Approximately 40% of pancreatic tumors smaller than 2 cm evade CT detection. A CNN distinguished pancreatic cancer tissue with 97.3–99.0% sensitivity and AUC 0.997–0.999 on local test sets, and 79.0% sensitivity / AUC 0.920 on a US dataset. CNN outperformed radiologists (98.3% vs 92.9%), correctly classified 11 of 12 radiologist-missed cancers (92%), and reached 92.1% sensitivity for tumors <2 cm.
DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30078-9 · PMID 33328124
論文を読む ↗
Radiology · 2023
Nationwide Study
Pancreatic Cancer Detection on CT Scans with Deep Learning: A Nationwide Population-based Study
Pancreatic Cancer Detection on CT Scans with Deep Learning: A Nationwide Population-based Study
1,473全国リアルワールド CT
AUC 0.95全国検証
89.7%感度
Pancreatic Cancer Detection on CT Scans with Deep Learning: A Nationwide Population-based Study.
~40% of pancreatic tumors <2 cm are missed at abdominal CT. An end-to-end DL tool (segmentation CNN + ensemble of five CNNs) achieved 89.9% sensitivity / 95.9% specificity (AUC 0.96) internally, and across 1,473 nationwide real-world CT studies (669 malignant, 804 control): 89.7% sensitivity, 92.8% specificity, AUC 0.95, with 74.7% sensitivity for tumors <2 cm.
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.220152 · PMID 36098642
論文を読む ↗
Radiology: Imaging Cancer · 2021
Radiomics
Radiomic Features at CT Can Distinguish Pancreatic Cancer from Noncancerous Pancreas
Radiomic Features at CT Can Distinguish Pancreatic Cancer from Noncancerous Pancreas
米/台2 集団での検証
AUC 0.98台湾テストセット
94.7%感度・台湾
Radiomic Features at CT Can Distinguish Pancreatic Cancer from Noncancerous Pancreas.
XGBoost radiomic analysis of CT patches distinguished PDAC from noncancerous pancreas. The generalized model (trained on Taiwanese + U.S. data) reached 94.7% sensitivity / 95.4% specificity / AUC 0.98 on the Taiwanese test set, and 80.6% / 100% / AUC 0.91 on the U.S. test set. PDACs showed lower intensity and higher heterogeneity radiomic features.
DOI: 10.1148/rycan.2021210010 · PMID 34241550
論文を読む ↗
BMC Cancer · 2023
Real-world Dataset
Detection of pancreatic cancer with two- and three-dimensional radiomic analysis in a nationwide population-based real-world dataset
Detection of pancreatic cancer with two- and three-dimensional radiomic analysis in a nationwide population-based real-world dataset
1,477全国リアルワールド CT
AUC 0.947検証結果
91.8%感度
Detection of pancreatic cancer with two- and three-dimensional radiomic analysis in a nationwide population-based real-world dataset.
An automatic end-to-end CAD tool combining 2D and 3D radiomic machine-learning analysis reached 91.8% sensitivity / 82.2% specificity / AUC 0.947 in 1,477 nationwide CT studies (671 PC, 806 controls), with 70.7% sensitivity for tumors <2 cm. Running 2D and 3D analyses in series raised specificity to 95.2%.
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-10536-8 · PMID 36650440
論文を読む ↗
J Gastroenterol Hepatol · 2021
Review
Applications of artificial intelligence in pancreatic and biliary diseases
Applications of artificial intelligence in pancreatic and biliary diseases
ReviewReview
ML+DL方法論の概要
膵胆疾患応用領域
Applications of artificial intelligence in pancreatic and biliary diseases.
A concise review of major AI methodologies (machine learning, deep learning) and the current landscape of AI research in pancreatobiliary diseases — where diagnosis and treatment selection are often complex — covering detection/diagnosis, risk stratification and prognosis prediction to supplement clinicians.
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15380 · PMID 33624891
論文を読む ↗
日本語訳は原文抄録に基づく整理です。詳細は PubMed の原文をご確認ください。
臨床エビデンスへ戻る